anscript of democratic Debate - you mean selected excerpts?
Date:
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:12:54 -0400
From:
Leah Faerstein
To:
letters@washpost.com
I was checking your transcript to see one of the most important
responses (on the dangers of preemption) and noticed it was missing .
For your information, here's what you didn't include in your transcript:
"Clark, who has been very critical of the Bush administration's foreign
policy since entering the race, charged Thursday that its "pre-emptive
doctrine," as expressed in attacking Iraq, "is causing North Korea and
Iran to accelerate their nuclear weapons development."
He also challenged other candidates who serve in Congress to directly
confront the president on that issue.
"Let's see you take apart that doctrine of pre-emption now. I don't
think we can wait until November of 2004 to change the administration on
this threat," he said. "We're marching into another military campaign in
the Middle East. We need to stop it."
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/10/elec04.prez.democrats.debate/index.html
Can you explain to me why this was excluded from your transcript? Was it
not newsworthy ? Too long? Too boring? Too irrelevant?
Please enlighten me.
No comments:
Post a Comment