Not Your Sweetie

On NYT


(#69) (No rating)

by Donna Z on 06/01/2004 11:34:28 AM EST

Rate this: - 1 2 3 4 5 + | Parent | Reply

Vicky_you are on a roll! I had the Unger piece mailed to myself because this was brought up the other night on the blog. Someone called it "unproven" and a discredited assertion that has been dismissed by the 911 panel. From the article it would seem that there is much more to it.
"Send Dooh Nibor back to Sex-at" -
David Brooks the creep who referred to Clark as "mean" on the NewsHour and iirc, as anti-semitic in the NYT, needs a letter. In his column today he acts as if bushCo's short term tax strategy  is great or okay, it is just the long term tax policy that is wandering around "Red Ink Land" without a plan. There is indeed a plan, there has been a plan for years, it is called starve the government so that social programs can be "flushed down the drain." (I put quotes around that but need to check for Norquist's exact words.)
Also, while ranting about the NYT, I think that they need to get off their sword and start researching and honestly reporting the truth. Feeling bad for helping to start a war may look good in the editorial pages, but the WMD does not stand alone, besides, WMDs are soooooo 2003! What about the news they've failed to print? Why are they still sending paychecks to the  Kay Sealey and Adam Nourgay (sp.)